The ANALYSIS OF THE POVERTY STATUS OF RURAL HOUSEHOLDS INVOLVED IN HONEY PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES IN ABIA STATE, NIGERIA

  • Ibeneme Grace
  • AGBAREVO .
  • M.N. B
  • IBENEME .
  • G. C.
  • OKRINGBO .
  • J. I.
Keywords: Rural, household, honey, production

Abstract

The study assessed the poverty status of rural households’involved in honey production activities in Abia state, Nigeria. Data were collected using structured questionnaire. Multistage sampling involving purposive and random sampling techniques was used in selecting one hundred and twenty (120) honeybee farmers for the study. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques andtobit regression model. The estimate of poverty profile showed that 54.17% of the respondents were non-poor using the 2/3 Per Capita Expenditure (PCE) which classified the households into Non- poor, moderately and extremely poor. The result further demonstratesthat bee farmers were actively involved in baiting,marketing, harvesting, processing and bottlingactivities and rarely involved in labeling of their products.The study also shows thatlack of credit (=5.46), lack of capital (=4.88), bee aggressiveness (=4.45), insufficient equipment (=4.26) and absconding of bees (=4.03) were the most important factors militating against honey production in the state and wereranked 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5threspectively. The tobit regression showed a Chi2value of 108.11 which was highly significant at 1% level of probability indicating goodness of fit of the tobit regression line of which four out of the eleven coefficients of the explanatory variables were highly significant at 1 % and 5% levels of probability. The coefficient for level of technical expertise, and income from propolis, were significant and negatively related to the probability and intensity of poverty at 1%level, while the coefficient forincome from beeswax and quantity of bee hives were also negative and significant at 5% level of probability. From the findings, it could be concluded that honey production is highly profitable and has a positive effect on the poverty profile of rural households involved in it. Therefore, the H0which statesthat honey production has no significant effect on the poverty status of the rural households in the study area was rejected at 5% level and the alternative accepted. The paper recommended thatgovernment should encourage bee farmers through the provision of incentives, such as credit.

Author Biography

AGBAREVO .

Department of Rural Sociology and Agricultural Extension

 Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria

References

Ahmad, F., Joshi, S. R. & Gurung, M, B. (2007). Nepal:Beekeeping And Rural Development. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Khumaltar.
Anyaegbulam, H.N.; C.O. Emereole C.I., and G.O., Chukwu (2006). Economics of bee boney production in Abia State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Tropical Agriculture.20: 27-29.
Holloway, G., Nicholson, C., Delgado, C., Staal, S and Ehui, S, (2004). A Revisited Tobit Procedure for Mitigating Bias in the Presence of Non-Zero Censoring with an Application to Milk-Market Participation in the Ethiopian Highlands.
Ibeneme, G. C. (2016). Profitability of honey production as a means of poverty alleviation among rural households in Abia State, Nigeria’. A Masters thesis, Department of Rural Sociology and Extension, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, UmudikeAbia State, Nigeria.
Law,B. and Chidel, M. (2007). Effects of logging on nectar producing Eucalyptus. Electronic Journal on Research and Development Corporation. Publication number 07/138 project number SFNZA. I P. Pp 10
Nkamleu, G.B (2007). On Measuring; indebtedness of African Countries. African Finance Journal, 9 (1):21–38.
NPC(2006). National Population Commission Census Report, Abia State.
Obialor, W.B. (2003). Bee Rearing and Honey Production. Nsukka:Dominion Lithography Press.
Omoruyi, S.A., Orhue, U.X., Akerobo, A.A. and Aghimien, C.I.(1998): Prescribed Agric. science for senior secondary schools. (Revised edition). Udodo Umen publishers Ltd.
Onugu, B.A.N.(2005). “Small and medium enterprises(SMES) in Nigeria: Problems and prospects”; A Ph.Ddissertation submitted to the St. Clements University Ado Ekiti Nigeria.
Onyekuru, N.A. (2004). “Economic Analysis of Honey production in Nsukka Local Government of Enugu State, Nigeria’’. An Undergraduate project Report, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsuka.
Paterson P.D.(2006). A Lang troth hive with top bars instead of frames, for Tropical Africa Bees. Bee world. Pp 6-69
Workneh, A; Ranjitha P, and Ranjan, S. K. (2008). Adoption of improved box hive in Atsbi Wemberta district of Eastern zone, Tigray Region: Determinants and Financial Benefits: Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers.Project Working Paper. ILRINairobi:International Livestock Research Institute
World Bank (2015). Forecasts. Retrieved on October 6, 2015 from www.worldbank.org.
World Bank Group (2011). Empowerment. Retrieved on February 26, 2014 from http://web.worldbank.org/wbsite/external/topics/extpoverty/extempowerment/o,contentmdk:20245753-pagepk:210058 pipk:210062-thesite/pk:486411,00.html.
World Bank (1996) Nigeria: poverty in the midst of poverty, the challenge of growth with inclusion. A World Bank Poverty Assessment Hand Book. Pp 91
Yirga, G and Ftwi, K. (2010). Beekeeping for rural development: Its potentiality and constraints in Eastern Tigray.Northern Ethiopia Agricultural Journal,5 (3): 201-204
Published
2019-01-31
How to Cite
Grace, I., ., A., B, M., ., I., C., G., ., O., & I., J. (2019). The ANALYSIS OF THE POVERTY STATUS OF RURAL HOUSEHOLDS INVOLVED IN HONEY PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES IN ABIA STATE, NIGERIA. IJO - International Journal of Agriculture and Research ( ISSN 2814-189X ), 2(1), 01-14. Retrieved from http://www.ijojournals.com/index.php/ar/article/view/77