BARRIERS TO THE EFFECTIVE CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS SPEAK OUT

  • Mufunani Tungu Khosa Zimbabwe Open University, Harare, Zimbabwe
  • Claretah Makuvire Faculty of Education, Zimbabwe Open University, Harare, Zimbabwe
Keywords: Curriculum, curriculum implementation, barriers, secondary schools

Abstract

The study focused on the barriers tothe implementation of the updated curriculum in Zimbabwean secondary schools. A case study design was used in Goromonzi District in Mashonaland East Province of Zimbabwe. Cluster, random and purposive sampling wereused to select 45 teachers and five school heads from a population of 825 teachers and 35 school heads. The sample included teachers and school heads from different educational contexts: boarding, urban, rural, mine, farm, and resettlement schools. NVivo Version 10 was used analyse data generated from semi-structured questionnaires and in-depth interviews. The key barriers to curriculum implementation included scarcity of human and non-human resources, inadequate remuneration, unacceptable working conditions, lack of knowledge in curriculum issues, and lack of standardization in the management of curriculum change, and political interference. The study recommended that the government must recruit enough teachers to implement the curriculum in the schools; there is also need for provision of resources such as adequate buildings, information, and communication technology (ICT) gadgets, and electricity. Teachers must be paid meaningful salaries and their working conditions improved to reflect their status in society. Teachers must be adequately prepared to handle curriculum issues. Political interference in schools should be minimised.

Author Biographies

Mufunani Tungu Khosa, Zimbabwe Open University, Harare, Zimbabwe

Faculty of Education, 

Claretah Makuvire, Faculty of Education, Zimbabwe Open University, Harare, Zimbabwe

Faculty of Education, Zimbabwe Open University, Harare, Zimbabwe

References

Alsubaie, M. A., (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in Curriculum Development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7 (9) 106-107.
Buchanan, M. T. &Engebreston, K., (2009). The significance of theory in the implementation of curriculum change in Religious Education. British Journal of Religious Education, 31(2), 141-152.
Carl, A. E., (2005). The Voice of the Teacher: The Voice Crying in the Wilderness? South African Journal of Education, 25(4), 223-228.
Chiedza, W., Makaye, J. &Mandedza, L., (2013). Vocationalisation of secondary schools: Implementation Reality or Fallacy? European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(1), 123-132.
Chinyani, H., (2013). Exploring the feasibility of school-based curriculum development in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 2(1), 128-134.
Chirimuuta, C., (2006). Gender and the Zimbabwean education policy: empowerment or perpetuation of gender imbalances. Quiet Mountain Essays. http://www.quietmountainessays.org.
Dzimiri, W. &Marimo, S.T., (2015). Challenges being faced in the implementation of the Zimbabwe localized Advanced Level Geography syllabus: A case of Gweru district high schools. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary social sciences, 4(2), 52-56.
Dziwa, D. D., Chindedza, W., &Mpondi, J.G., (2013). Curriculum innovation or renovation: Feasibility in Zimbabwean secondary schools. Academic Research International. 4(1), 314-319.
Eunitah, V., Chindedza, W., Makaye, J. &Mapetere, K., (2013).Centrally designed curricula in developing educational context: Challenges and possibilities. Standard Journal of Education and Essay, 1(3), 40-44.
Fullan, M., (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Columbia University Press.
Handler, B., (2010). Teacher as curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom- based practioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership.3(3), 32- 42.
Mawere, D., (2013). Evaluation of the Nziramasanga report on inquiry into education in Zimbabwe, 1999: The case of gender equity in education. International Journal of Asian Social Sciences. 3(5), 1077-1088.
Munikwa, S., (2011). Analysis of the current Zimbabwe’s secondary two pathway educational curriculum. Journal of Innovative Research in Education, 1(1), 2-35.
O’Donnell, K., (2005). Japanese Secondary English Teachers Negotiation of Educational Roles in the face of curricular Reform, language, Culture & Curriculum. 18, 300-315.
Ogar, O. E. &Awhen, O. F., (2015). Teachers’ perceived problems of curriculum implementation in tertiary institutions in Cross River State of Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice. 6(19), 145-151.
Okoth, T.A., (2016). Challenges of implementing a top down curriculum innovation in English language teaching: Perspectives of Form 111English language teachers in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice. 7(3), 169-177.
Oliva, P., (2005). Developing the curriculum. McGraw-Hill.
Onyeachu, J. A. E., (2008). Implementation issues in secondary education curriculum in Nigeria: A problems and prospects. International Journal of Research Development. 5, 153-159.
Pedzisai, C., Tsvere, M., &Nkhonde, M., (2014). The Zimbabwean two pathway education curriculum: Insights into policy implementation challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences. 3(5),162-167.
Published
2021-05-31