Moderating and Interacting Effects of Management Team Characteristics on Financial Performance

  • Vincent Nwani The Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Keywords: Moderating, Interacting, Management Team, Corporate Governance, Financial Performance

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of the management team characteristics on corporate governance mechanisms in predicting the financial performance of banks in Nigeria. The study employed dynamic panel models to examine the influence of four board attributes (size, independence, diligence, and diversity), management team characteristics (size and diversity), and two control variables (firm size and firm age) on financial performance, measured by the cost of capital, liquidity, and return on assets. These variables were selected and included in models based on the postulates of the agency theory and human capital theory.

The data series collected on each variable were sourced from the annual audited accounts and reports of 12 purposively selected listed banks over the years 2011 to 2023. The data were then analyzed using descriptive tools such as mean and standard deviation and panel regression techniques. The study employed the generalized method of moments (GMM) technique to estimate panel regression models after testing for normality, multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity and endogeneity problems.

The panel regression results on the relationship between management team characteristics and financial performance showed that management team size had a significant positive effect on cost of capital and liquidity. Again, management team size had a significant positive effect on cost of capital while both size and diversity of management team had a significant positive and negative effect, respectively on liquidity. Moreover, the way the board attributes affected financial performance changed over the size and diversity of management team. Management team size played a moderating role in increasing the negative effect of board independence on liquidity, with negative net effect in modulating the effect of board size on cost of capital and positive net effect in moderating the effect of board diligence on return on assets. Similarly, management team diversity significantly increased the negative effect of board diversity on cost of capital, increasing the negative effect of board diligence on liquidity, and made board independence to have a significant negative effect on return on assets, with a positive net effect from the relevance of management team diversity modulating the effect of board size and board diversity on liquidity.

The study concluded that effective corporate governance practices, coupled with a diverse sizeable management team, are pivotal in driving positive financial outcomes for listed banks in Nigeria. Its implications for the financial objectives of the banks, oversight function of the board of directors, and regulations were highlighted.

References

Aboramadan, M. (2020). Women in management and firm performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(5), 455–472.

Asongu, S. A., Nnanna, J., & Acha-Anyi, P. N. (2020a). Finance, inequality and inclusive education in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Analysis and Policy, 67, 162-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.07.006

Asongu, S. A., Nnanna, J., & Acha-Anyi, P. N. (2020b). Inequality and gender economic inclusion: The moderating role of financial access in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Analysis and Policy, 65, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.01.002

Balaboniene, I., & Vecerskiene, G. (2015). The aspects of performance measurement in public sector organization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 314–320.

Bang, H., & Overland, J. (2009). Teams in organizations: The influence of leadership and structure on team performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(5), 987–1006.

Bang, H., & Thomas, K. (2017). Team effectiveness: The impact of team input and process on team outcomes. Team Performance Management, 23(7/8), 364–379.

Barroso-Castro, C., Villegas-Periñan, M. M., & Dominguez, M. (2017). Board members’ contribution to strategy: The mediating role of board internal processes. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(2), 82–89.

Barutcugil, I. (2013). Yönetim: Kavramlar, ilkeler ve teknikler [Management: Concepts, principles, and techniques]. Istanbul: Kariyer Yayınları.

Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.

Buachoom, W. (2018). The effect of board characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from Thailand. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 10(1), 123–135.

Central Bank of Nigeria. (2017). Annual report and statement of accounts. Abuja, Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria.

Chandler, A. D. (1940). The beginnings of ‘big business’ in American industry. Business History Review, 14(1), 1–31.

Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. MIT Press.

Drucker, P. F. (1964). Managing for results. Harper & Row.

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Gupta, A. (2017). Financial performance analysis of selected banks in India. International Journal of Commerce and Management Research, 3(7), 1–5.

Handy, C. (2000). The age of unreason (2nd ed.). Harvard Business School Press.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Kafidipe, A., Uwalomwa, U., Dahunsi, O., & Okeme, M. (2021). Corporate governance and financial performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 10(1), 1–15.

Keiser, L. R. (2002). Bureaucratic discretion, agency structure, and democratic responsiveness: The case of the United States Social Security Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(1), 1–23.

Kubo, K., & Nguyen, Q. T. (2020). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Japan and Vietnam. Asian Business & Management, 19(2), 183–207.

Lucas, R. E. (1990). Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? American Economic Review, 80(2), 92–96.

Mertzunis, A., Papadopoulos, D., & Karagiorgos, T. (2018). Return on assets and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration, 6(3), 48–60.

Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. Columbia University Press.

Mutercimler, E. (2011). Yönetim ve organizasyon [Management and organization]. Istanbul: Alfa Yayınları.

Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of board diversity on firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1342–1356.

Nakpodia, F., Sakariyahu, R., Fagbemi, T., Adigun, R., & Dosumu, O. (2024). Sustainable Development Goals, Accounting Practices and Public Financial Management: A Pre and Post COVID-19 Assessment. The British Accounting Review, 101466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101466

Ndum, V., & Oranefe, O. (2021). Management size and firm performance in Nigerian banks. Journal of African Business, 22(3), 317–335.

Obiefuna, A. (2014). The Role of Top Management in Business Organizations. Department of Public Administration. Retrieved from www.arabianjbmr.com/RPAM_index.php

Overfield, D. (2016). Management teams and organizational performance: The role of team effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 53(2), 234–250.

Pandey, I. M. (2018). Financial management (12th ed.). Vikas Publishing House.

Pilbeam, S. (2010). People resourcing and talent planning. Pearson Education.

Pintea, M., Fulop, M. T., & Popescu, M. (2020). Return on assets and firm performance: Evidence from Romania. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 29(1), 232–241.

Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2020). The impact of board characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(5), 909–934.

Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

Song, J., Lee, K., & Kang, S. (2021). Board diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 13(4), 2001.

Sweetland, S. R. (1996). Human capital theory: Foundations of a field of inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 341–359.

Taiwo, J. N., & Agwu, M. E. (2016). Problems and prospects of poverty alleviation programmes in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 4(6), 18–36.

Tchamyou, V. S., & Asongu, S. A. (2017). Information sharing and financial sector development in Africa. Journal of African Business, 18(1), 24-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2016.1216233

Tovmasyan, G. (2017). The Role of Managers in Organizations: Psychological Aspects. In I. K.-N. Violeta Zubanov, The Role of Management Teams in Business. Republic of Armenia.

Wageman, R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). What makes teams of leaders leadable? Organizational Dynamics, 39(3), 260–267.

Wageman, R., Hackman, J. R., & Lehman, E. V. (2008). Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(4), 373–398.

Zimmerman, M. A. (2008). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(3), 338–354.

Zubanov, N. (2017). Management size and firm performance: Evidence from Russia. Economics of Transition, 25(2), 261–290.

Published
2025-09-13
How to Cite
Nwani, V. (2025). Moderating and Interacting Effects of Management Team Characteristics on Financial Performance. IJO -International Journal of Business Management ( E:ISSN 2811-2504 ) (P.ISSN: 2384-5961), 8(08), 01-32. Retrieved from https://www.ijojournals.com/index.php/bm/article/view/1129